Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00361
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hughes v. Wright et al
as 2:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Thomas Wright, Ryan Blackwell, Joeseph McAffee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Centurion et al
as 2:2015cv00129
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Plaintiff:
Hugh Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Guy et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Buckner, Bivens and Travis Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Gallion et al
as 2:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Lt. Butch Gallion, Robert Russell Mattocks and Gregg Eichelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Hamblen County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriff's Department, Correct Health Inc., Teresa Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hughes v. Rogersville City Police Dept. et al
as 2:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Martin Hughes
Defendant:
Rogersville City Police Dept., Joey Maddox and Charles Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Rogersville City Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Defendant:
Rogersville City Police Department, Joey Maddox and Charles Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
William Hughes and Jeanne Hughes
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Collier Development Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
