Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Cases 61 - 67 of 67
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009mc00047
Plaintiff: Darryl Lamont Davis
Defendant: United States of America, United States Attorney General, Tracy L Stone and others
Davis v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00600
Plaintiff: Darryl Lamont Davis
Defendant: United States of America, United States Attorney General, Tracy L Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Morrow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00183
Petitioner: Jeffery S Nichols
Respondent: James Morrow and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nix v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00030
Plaintiff: Robert Sherman Nix, III
Defendant: United States of America, United States Attorney General and United States P and A
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Civil Rights None
Emmerick v. City of Gatlinburg, Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00305
Plaintiff: Marc D Emmerick
Defendant: City of Gatlinburg, Tennessee, Rodney Burns, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Willcox v. Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00359
Plaintiff: Edith S Willcox
Defendant: Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference, James W Kirby and Russell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Palmer v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 2:2007cv00030
Petitioner: Michael H Palmer
Respondent: Tennessee, State of and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?