Cases 61 - 70 of 172
Hartley v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2017cv00199
Plaintiff:
Dallas J Hartley, Jr
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners and Carter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Hawkins County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Andrew Bowman
Defendant:
Hawkins County Jail, Corey Young, Donna Kay Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2017mc00015
Plaintiff:
Dallas J Hartley, Jr
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Metropolitan Gov't of Elizabethton and Carter County
Green v. William (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Harry Louis Green
Defendant:
Lara William, BB & T Bank, Region Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Green v. Knight et al (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Harry Louis Green
Defendant:
Thomas Knight, Kara L. West, First American Title Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Short v. Carter County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Scott Wayne Short
Defendant:
Carter County Jail, Medical Staff, Megueses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forster et al v. Carter Distributing Company, Inc. et al (JRG1)
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jacob Forster , Gavin Warrick and Charles Hammon
Defendant:
Carter Distributing Company, Inc., Premium Brands, Inc. and Blair Carter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
King v. Miracle Lake et al
as 1:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carter King
Defendant:
Miracle Lake, Byron Goodman and Sandra N. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bufford v. Carter County et al
as 2:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bufford, Sr
Defendant:
Carter County, Carter County Court, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. USAA Property and Casualty Company
as 2:2016cv00353
Defendant:
USAA Property and Casualty Company
Plaintiff:
James Darwin Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
