Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
US Framing International, LLC v. Continental Building Company et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
US Framing International, LLC
Defendant:
Continental Building Company, Rick Adante, Todd Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Baker v. Breuche
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Myles Baker
Defendant:
Lara Breuche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Baker v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Myles Baker
Defendant:
Matthew Neal and Anna Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Anderson et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
David Anderson, Robert Ballero Gonzalez, Deneen Brown and others
Defendant:
ARC Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Baker v. Osmond et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Myles Baker
Defendant:
Brady Osmond and Tara Osmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Baker v. Dinning et al
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Myles Baker
Defendant:
John Dinning and Colleen Dinning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation, Clifton L Corker, Jane Doe3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Anthony et al v. Van Over et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
William Anthony, PBA Martial Arts, Inc., Katie Baker and others
Defendant:
Barry Van Over, Myles Baker, Brent Seebohm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robinson v. Spangler et al
as 3:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Travis Lewis Robinson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Spangler, Cpl Baker, Cpl. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
