Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Youngblood v. Chime Financial, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Youngblood
Defendant:
Chime Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ayers et al v. Hargett et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Betty Jane Ayers, David Russell Ayers and Sarah Walker Bruun
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Stephens, Gen. Jonathan Skrmetti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bruun et al v. Hargett et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Sarah Walker Bruun, David Russell Ayers and Betty Jane Ayers
Defendant:
Tre Hargett and Mark Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Spight v. Reuhland
as 1:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Betty Spight and Betty Spight
Defendant:
Brian Reuhland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Aldridge et al v. Regions Bank
as 3:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Everett Mills, Rick Eldridge, Louis Frank Knight and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Rainsford v. Apex Bank
as 3:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Bettis C Rainsford, Sr
Defendant:
Apex Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Apex Bank et al v. Rainsford
as 3:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
Brad Hailey, Apex Bank and Matthew D. Daniels
Defendant:
Bettis Rainsford and Bettis C Rainsford, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Abbott et al v. United States of America (JRG1)
as 3:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jody T. Bertram, Kelsey Y. Chambers, Larry D. Raymes and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Anderson et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (TV3)
as 3:2019cv00219
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith, Lindsey Sitzlar, Mary Smith and others
Defendant:
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
