Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Colbaugh v. Meigs County et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Defendant:
Meigs County, Meigs County Sheriff's Department, Robert Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Meigs County Government et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ALEXANDER SMITH
Defendant:
MEIGS COUNTY GOVERNMENT and ROBERT J LEONARD
Intervenor:
Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McGhee et al v. Grainger County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Candace McGhee and Chasity Bailey
Defendant:
Grainger County, Tennessee, James Harville, Chris Harville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Davis
as 3:2020cv00410
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ray Walker
Defendant:
Scottie Ryan Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier et al v. Stabus et al (PLR3)
as 2:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Samuel Jones, Andrew Cross, Joe Herron and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Nolan
as 3:2019cv00152
Plaintiff:
Leonard Chambers
Defendant:
Josh Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al (TWP2)
as 3:2018cv00278
Defendant:
Sevier County, DOES 1-10, Ronald L Seals and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Dunlap and Jesse Paul Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haynes v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Leonard Haynes
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Tennessee Department of Corrections, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sands v. USA
as 3:2018cv00057
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leonard Sands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
