Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Covenant Life International, Inc. v. City of Norris, Tennessee et al
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Covenant Life International, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Norris, Tennessee, Lisa Crumply and Lisa Crumpley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benford v. Knox County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Taj Verne Benford
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Office, Tom Spangler, Bernie Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norris v. USA
as 1:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Mark Norris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Norris v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv00266
Petitioner:
Mark Norris
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glatz v. Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newcomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Lynn Tarwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norris Bros. Excavating, LLC v. Southern Pipe & Supply Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00357
Plaintiff:
Norris Brothers Excavating, LLC and Norris Bros. Excavating, LLC
Defendant:
Southern Pipe & Supply, Inc. and Southern Pipe & Supply Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Ford Motor Company (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Bailey, Mary Mcknatt, Lana Rymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Norris v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ashley Leann Norris
Defendant:
Tavarus Carr and Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Glatz v. Newcomb
as 3:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Ronald C Newcomb, G.W. McCoig, FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
