Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Humphreys v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Hoyal Victor Humphreys
Interested Party:
Social Security, Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bazzoon v. Kidd et al
as 3:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Officer Hayes, Nurse Whitehead, Cpl R. Kidd and others
Plaintiff:
James Delaney Bazzoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Security Services, Inc.v. United States Court Security Officers
as 1:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Security Services, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Court Security Officers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Stewart et al v. Guy et al
as 1:2012cv00184
Plaintiff:
W Ray Stewart, J.P. Stewart and J. Doe
Defendant:
Joe Guy, City of Niota, TN, City of Athens, TN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United Government Security Officers Of America, International Union v. Tennessee Valley Corporation
as 3:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
United Government Security Officers Of America International Union, United Government Security Officers Of America International Union, United Government Security Officers Of America, International Union and Its Local Union No. 22 and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United Government Security Officers Of America International Union v. Pinkerton Government Services, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
United Government Security Officers Of America, International Union and United Government Security Officers Of America, International Union's Local Union 26
Defendant:
Pinkerton Government Services, Inc and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
