Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Mitchell v. Taylor et al
as 3:2021cv00553
Defendant:
City of Hartsville, TN, Wilson Taylor, Kimberly Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Swift et al
as 3:2021cv00505
Defendant:
Andrea Finlay Swift, Judge Dianne Turner, Judge William L. Campbell, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00648
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Sumner Station et al
as 3:2020cv00650
Defendant:
Sumner Regional Medical Center, Sumner Station, Dianna Shipley and others
Plaintiff:
George Taylor and Caleb Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker et al v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Taylor Hart, T.J. Miller, Lance Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Harley Lambert, Tiffany Lewis, Shannon Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morris et al v. City of Ridgetop, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Plaintiff:
Tillman Bratton, Shawn Taylor, Bryan Morris and others
Defendant:
Sam Rider, Mark Johnson, City of Ridgetop, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edoho-Eket v. RH, Restoration Hardware Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01327
Defendant:
RH, Restoration Hardware Inc., Chelsea L. Taylor and Lincoln Property Management
Plaintiff:
Udeme Edoho-Eket
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
