Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Valentine v. Gay
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Valentine
Defendant:
Dee David Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hicks v. City of Millersville et al
as 3:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
Mason Robert James Hicks
Defendant:
City of Millersville, Melissa Pearce, Blake Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Whitley et al
as 3:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Paul Walwyn, Dee Gay, John W. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burley v. Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force
as 3:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Ivan Antjuan Burley
Defendant:
Sumner County 18th Judicial Drug Task Force, Officer Jason Arnold, Sumner County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trisko v. Kropf Farms et al
as 3:2018cv00302
Plaintiff:
Dee Trisko
Defendant:
Kropf Farms , Tony Kropf , John Kropf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Whitley et al
as 3:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
James R. Reece
Defendant:
L. Ray Whitley, Chris Vines, The City of Gallatin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Snider v. Frasier, Frasier and Hickman L.L.P. et al
as 3:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Karen Snider
Defendant:
Frasier, Frasier and Hickman L.L.P., Frank W. Frasier, III, Jane Doe Frasier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reece v. Sumner County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2009cv01049
Petitioner:
James Richardson Reece
Respondent:
Sumner County, Tennessee, James Hunter, C.L. "Buck" Rodgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
