Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lusa et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Yananta Isi Chito Lusa, Wild Fire, Hakeem Shabazz-El and others
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Donna Scott Davenport and Lynn Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. Cox et al
as 3:2021cv00653
Plaintiff:
Martha Arnita Lee and Bennie Lee
Defendant:
Jackie Cox, Glenn G. Dukes, Brandon McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crespo v. White County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ismael Crespo
Defendant:
Kyle Meyer, Steve Page, Jacob Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse et al v. Nabors et al
as 2:2019cv00049
Plaintiff:
Erin Patterson, Gabriel Biser, Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse and others
Defendant:
Wayne Nabors, Lisa Duke Crowell, William K. Knowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Shannon v. The Duke Apartments of Nashville, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00697
Defendant:
The Giddings Group, LLC and The Duke Apartments of Nashville, LLC
Plaintiff:
Leann Shannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Hall v. Overton County et al
as 2:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hall
Defendant:
Overton County, John Garrett and Daniel Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
