Cases 61 - 70 of 765
Woods v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00440
Petitioner:
Joshua A. Woods
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bradley v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00400
Petitioner:
Benjamin Bradley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramey v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Terious D. Ramey
Respondent:
A.U.S.P. Thomson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
DODSON v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
BRIAN DODSON
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. United States
as 3:2022cv00273
Petitioner:
Carlton Victor Smith
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Onyebuagu v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00230
Petitioner:
Comstatuous Cameka Onyebuagu
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Montejo v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00219
Petitioner:
Jennifer Montejo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Goff v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00215
Petitioner:
Laqueston Goff
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cannamela v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Curt Russell Cannamela
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Darden v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00155
Petitioner:
Marcus T. Darden
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
