Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Shelby v. Dickson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Roy B. Shelby
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Daryl B. Vaughn and Brad Vaughn
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Office, Casey Cox, Tim Claflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Dusty Rhodes, Williamson County Jail, Sgt. (f/n/u) Driskill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Klaflin et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daryl B. Vaughn
Defendant:
Tim Klaflin, Charlie Dixon and James Halbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Page et al
as 3:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
David A. Avery
Defendant:
Roger A. Page, D. Michael Swiney, Arnold B. Goldin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Morgan et al
as 3:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
Roy B. Morgan, City of Jackson Police Department, Nick Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamby v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2021cv00032
Petitioner:
Darren B. Hamby
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shoemake v. Trousdale County et al
as 3:2020cv00672
Plaintiff:
Erick B. Shoemake
Defendant:
Trousdale County and CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wlodarz v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00292
Defendant:
Centurion of Tennessee, LLC and Edmund Lane
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Wlodarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hamblen Co. Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Defendant:
Hamblen Co. Sheriffs Dept., B. Stewart, Teresa Brumbelow and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
