Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Shirley v. Simms et al
as 3:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Thomas Shirley
Defendant:
Dr. Amanda Simms, Michael Parris, Dr. Emily Olroid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rucker v. Purviance et al
as 3:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Morris Rucker
Defendant:
Jim Purviance, Richard Montgomery, Zane Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howe v. Worley
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Amanda Worley
Plaintiff:
Jim Howe doing business as Big Jim's Bonding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. The City of Clarksville et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
The City of Clarksville, Ted Crozier, Jr., Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Thomas Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elrod et al v. No Tax 4 Nash et al
as 3:2020cv00617
Defendant:
Kimberly Edwards, John Does 1-10, Michelle Foreman and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kaufman, Rachael Anne Elrod and Sarah Martin
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Wortman III v. State of Tennessee Board of Parole et al
as 3:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Mark Edward Davidson, f/n/u Stewart, Richard Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Auston Wortman III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Werich et al
as 3:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Moore and Julian F. Carter II
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Lee Rayborn, Billy Nicluson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Dad's Towing Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00824
Defendant:
Dad's Towing Services, Inc., Jim Mitchell and Affordable Towing
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lloyd Wallace and Richard Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Howe v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv00067
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Jeff Slayton, Jason Elmore and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Howe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Haslam et al
as 3:2019cv00416
Defendant:
Roberta Nevil Kustoff, Richard Montgomery, Tim Gobble and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert C. Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
