Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Palmer v. Lincoln County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Christopher Palmer, Jr.
Defendant:
Lincoln County Sheriffs Dept., Shannon Bostic, Doug Boernger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogletree v. Pitts et al
as 3:2014cv02382
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Ogletree, Jr.
Defendant:
Chris Pitts and f/n/u Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitt Excavating LLC v. Pitt
as 3:2013cv00909
Plaintiff:
Pitt Excavating LLC
Defendant:
Mary Lou Pitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WilTel Communications, LLC et al v. Pitt Excavating, LLC
as 3:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
WilTel Communications, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Pitt Excavating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Fifth Third Bank v. Monet et al
as 3:2012cv01074
Plaintiff:
Fifth Third Bank
Defendant:
Monet, Michael P. Dolan and William E. Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Butler v. Bluebonnet Chrysler Dodge, Ltd. et al
as 2:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Edward M. Butler, II
Defendant:
Bluebonnet Chrysler Dodge, Ltd. , Lenore Pitts , Todd McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SunTrust Bank v. Tele-Optics Nashville, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
SunTrust Bank
Defendant:
Tele-Optics Nashville, Inc., Wallace Grills, Brian Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
Jeff White
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, (f/n/u) Alexander, Madubueze Novozo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Alexander et al
as 3:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen White
Defendant:
f/n/u Alexander, Madubueze Novozo, David Sehorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
