Cases 21 - 30 of 35,569
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Fotohaus, LLC v. Monroe Operations, LLC
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Fotohaus, LLC
Defendant:
Monroe Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Vermeer Manufacturing Company v. AeroCine Ventures Inc.
as 3:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Vermeer Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
AeroCine Ventures Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Ward v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Leah Joy Ward
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlex Glass America, LLC v. Sompo America Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Carlex Glass America, LLC
Defendant:
Sompo America Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
Joseph A. Woodruff, Estate of Kimberly Helper, John Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Curran v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
John F. Curran
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jolley et al v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Michael Jolley and Connie Jolley
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
