Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey v. Zurich North America Ins. et al
as 3:2011cv00873
Plaintiff:
Noble Shekhem Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey
Defendant:
Zurich North America Ins., Wyne Dummond, Edward Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SunTrust Bank et al v. GLS Florida Property 2, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
SunTrust Bank
Defendant:
GLS Florida Property 2, LLC , Nashyork, LLC , Peter McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey v. Zurich North America Ins. et al
as 3:2011mc00044
Plaintiff:
Noble Shekhem Daawuud El Amen Ra Bey
Defendant:
Zurich North America Ins., Wyne Dummond, Edward Garner and others
Graham v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Albert Leroy Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BASF Corporation v. Graham Collision Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
BASF Corporation
Defendant:
Graham Collision Center, Inc. and Roger Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Hardin Co. Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Elijah W. Graham
Defendant:
Hardin Co. Correctional Facility, Ned Oldaker and James Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manning v. Gibson et al
as 3:2008cv00900
Petitioner:
Paul Graham Manning
Respondent:
William E. Gibson, Benjamin W. Fann, William M. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manning v. Gibson et al
as 3:2008mc00227
Plaintiff:
Paul Graham Manning
Defendant:
William E. Gibson, Benjamin W. Fann, William M. Locke and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
