Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Rudd et al v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Morton Rudd and Barbara Rudd
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tarvin v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Corey Tarvin
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Geneva G. Roberts, Shane McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dilbeck v. Centurion Management Care et al
as 3:2017cv01515
Plaintiff:
Robert Dilbeck
Defendant:
Centurion Management Care, Tennessee Department of Correction, MaHarry Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Phillips et al
as 3:2017cv01399
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Defendant:
Shawn Phillips, Tony Parker, f/n/u Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norfleet v. Renner et al
as 3:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Norfleet
Defendant:
Heather Ann Renner, Judy Farris , Houston County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milby v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Milby
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Jr. v. Martin et al
as 3:2017cv00868
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Jr.
Defendant:
Juston Martin , (f/n/u) Hunt , (f/n/u) Riker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Overton County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Lucas White
Defendant:
Overton County, Tennessee , John Garrett , Erin Renae Bullard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe #2 v. Haslam et al
as 3:2017cv00264
Plaintiff:
Doe #2 and John Doe #2
Defendant:
Haslam, William E. Haslam and Mark Gwyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKissack v. Schofield et al
as 1:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Michael McKissack
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
