Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Bennett et al v. Mays et al
as 3:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Tony Mays, Cpl. Robin Fish and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett and David McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of Tennessee et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2019cv00385
Defendant:
Donna Barrett, State Election Commission, The, Mike McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
League of Women Voters of Tennessee, Spread the Vote, American Muslim Advisory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
McDonald v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 3:2019cv00072
Petitioner:
Jessie D. McDonald
Respondent:
Tennessee Elections Commission and Federal Communications Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Mitchell v. Taylor et al
as 3:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
Dwight Mitchell
Defendant:
Hattie McDonald, Kimberly Taylor, City of Hartsville, TN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corum v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shane Corum
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Walter Stover, Kimberly Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Hickman County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00062
Plaintiff:
Burnace R. McDonald, Jr.
Defendant:
Hickman County Jail, Southern Health Partners and Lori Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. White et al
as 3:2016cv02817
Plaintiff:
Shawn Davis , Robin Davis and CRD Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Randolph Lee White, Greg B. McDonald, Big Shake, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyte v. McDonald
as 3:2016cv02799
Plaintiff:
Barbara Boyte
Defendant:
Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
