Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hall v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2017cv01268
Plaintiff:
Rachel Hall
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee , Megan Arnett , Benjamin Winkler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eye Health Partners of Alabama, Inc. v. Arnett Carraby, M.D., P.C. et al
as 3:2016cv03156
Plaintiff:
Eye Health Partners of Alabama, Inc.
Defendant:
Arnett Carraby, M.D., P.C. and Arnett Carraby, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howard v. Genovese et al
as 1:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
William A. Howard
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, Loden S. Holt, James B. Arnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes et al v. Sumner County Board of Education
as 3:2014cv01147
Plaintiff:
Arnett Hayes and Sherry Hayes
Defendant:
Sumner County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
(f/n/u) Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
