Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Clark v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2022cv02641
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lorenzo Clark
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), City of Memphis, Crystal Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Millen v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv02524
Plaintiff:
Kevin Millen
Defendant:
James Clark and Doris Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Millen v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2021cv02734
Plaintiff:
Kevin Millen
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy and James Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. City of Memphis
as 2:2021cv02365
Plaintiff:
Likisha Clark
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Counselor Hannah, Jailer Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Castle et al
as 2:2020cv02417
Defendant:
JOHN DOE-5, Matthew Richmond Davis, Michael Shane Dulaney and others
Plaintiff:
Jaleta Clark, Alorea Hardwick, Ernestine Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander v. Lexington Associates II, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv01220
Defendant:
Lexington Associates II, L.P., Casey Triplett, Sheila Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
