Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Jackson II v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2018cv02731
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Shelby County Sheriff Department and Oscar Webb
Plaintiff:
John Eris Jackson II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Shelby County Division of Correction et al
as 2:2018cv02573
Defendant:
Richard Holliday, Correct Care Solutions (CCS), Dr. Morton and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker, et al v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC ("CCS"), et al
as 2:2017cv02942
Plaintiff:
Crystal F. Tucker and Kelly Brumley
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, LLC ("CCS") , Gary Soileau , Anita Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williamson v. Hopkins et al
as 2:2017cv02733
Plaintiff:
Brian Orlandus Williamson
Defendant:
Alan B. Hopkins, Correction Care Solutions, Latrena Demens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Shelby County Division of Correction, et al
as 2:2017cv02473
Plaintiff:
Lavell Fontain Pennington
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Correction and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Woodard et al
as 1:2017cv01110
Plaintiff:
Joseph Powell
Defendant:
Jason Woodard, (f/n/u) Perry, (f/n/u) Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2017cv02213
Plaintiff:
Wayne Shannon
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, William J. Gupton, Jr., William Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Burrow et al
as 2:2017cv02058
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
LaTonya Burrow, Shelby County Mayor's Office, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 2:2016cv02787
Plaintiff:
Donyel Thomas
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Shelby County and Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erby v. Luttrell et al
as 2:2016cv03020
Plaintiff:
Fred Erby
Defendant:
Mark H. Luttrell, William J. Gupton, Jr., William Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
