Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Carpenter v. Lane College et al
as 2:2017cv02672
Plaintiff:
Kaylon Carpenter
Defendant:
Lane College and William Smith, III
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alexander et al v. DBG Hotels LLC et al
as 2:2016cv02670
Plaintiff:
Richard Alexander , Misty Alexander , Terry Balentine and others
Defendant:
DBG Hotels LLC and DBG Hotels LLC d/b/a Homewood Suites Memphis Hacks Cross
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clair v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv02263
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Clair
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Recontrust Company N.A., Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Johnson v. Lane
as 2:2015cv02260
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03001
Plaintiff:
Karen Lane
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Person v. Roach et al
as 2:2014cv02788
Defendant:
Ashley Roach , Lauderdale County , The City Of Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Earma Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulley v. Henderson County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willie Lane Pulley
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Heath Delaney and Collins Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Lane College
as 1:2013cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Bailey
Defendant:
Lane College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tidewater Transit Co., Inc. v. Sea Lane Express, Inc.
as 2:2012mc00045
Plaintiff:
Tidewater Transit Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Sea Lane Express, Inc.
Movant:
Dunavant Sea Lane Express, LLC
United States of America v. Assorted Electronic Equipment et al
as 2:2012cv02521
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Assorted Electronic Equipment
Claimant:
Esther Ward Lane
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
