Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Clark v. Genovese et al
as 1:2021cv01164
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Clark
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, Jacqueline Hagen, Freddie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Jones et al
as 2:2021cv02493
Plaintiff:
Sacorey Clark
Defendant:
K. Jones, A. Arias, Mr. Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Childress
as 2:2021cv02484
Petitioner:
Sacorey Clark
Respondent:
Mr. Childress and A. W. Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Childress et al
as 2:2021cv02458
Plaintiff:
Sacorey Clark
Defendant:
Mr. Childress, J. Vandiver, Mr. Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. City of Memphis
as 2:2021cv02365
Plaintiff:
Likisha Clark
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Counselor Hannah, Jailer Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner v. Clark et al
as 2:2021cv02109
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Services and Kenneth Clark
Plaintiff:
Makeda Gardner
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv02752
Plaintiff:
Trece Anderette Clark and Eddie White
Defendant:
Michael Howse, Shelby County Division of Corrections and Anthony Alexandra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts et al v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc
as 1:2020cv02685
Plaintiff:
Edna Roberts, Nellie Winfrey, Taliah Elliott and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi S.A., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
