Cases 21 - 30 of 193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Teran v. Lawn Enforcement et al
as 2:2022cv02338
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Teran, Eliberto Perez Ambrosio, Baltazar Calderon, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Lawn Enforcement, Jason Braden and Jamie Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rankins v. Shelby County Division of Correction et al
as 2:2022cv02273
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rankins
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Correction, Director Alexander, Capt. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2021cv02725
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Kenneth Southerland, D. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Childess
as 2:2021cv02622
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Walker
Respondent:
Acting Warden Childress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2021cv02542
Plaintiff:
Carol Walker
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Young v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02521
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Ms. Walker, Sgt. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
