Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Stephens v. Pitts et al
as 2:2024cv02430
Plaintiff:
Barry Stephens
Defendant:
Lt. Pitts, B. Chamber, Lt. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EXPRESS SERVICES INC v. V&S MEMPHIS GALVANIZING LLC
as 2:2024cv02349
Plaintiff:
EXPRESS SERVICES INC
Defendant:
V&S MEMPHIS GALVANIZING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fields v. Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
G'Andre V Fields
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanks v. A-C Electric Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02757
Plaintiff:
Don Hanks
Defendant:
A-C Electric Company, Inc., James V. Weatherington and Gregory W. Gaillard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02714
Petitioner:
Byron Pipkin
Respondent:
Lee V. Coffee and Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marine Flower, LLC v. F/V Riverine Enterprise (O/N 282733)
as 1:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Marine Flower, LLC
Defendant:
F/V Riverine Enterprise (O/N 282733)
Vaughn v. SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134 et al
as 2:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Vaughn
Defendant:
SCDC at 1045 Mullins St Rd Memphis TN 38134, Ofc. Smith, Ofc. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Boling et al
as 2:2023cv02503
Plaintiff:
Stanley Green
Defendant:
Ronald D. Boling, Joseph Vaughn, Lisa Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pipkin v. Coffee et al
as 2:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Defendant:
Lee V. Coffee, Leslie Byrd, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
