Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Joyner v. Heathcott & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Michael Joyner
Defendant:
Heathcott & Associates, LLC and Jeff Heathcott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nisbett v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
Ryan Merven Nisbett
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioner, 201 Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02192
Petitioner:
Charles Lee Joyner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trenell v. Joyner
as 2:2021cv02514
Petitioner:
Johnnie Edward Trenell
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joyner v. Vilsack
as 1:2021cv01089
Defendant:
Thomas J Vilsack
Plaintiff:
Adam Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams et al v. Adient US LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01197
Plaintiff:
Judy C Williams, Amber Tulley, Patricia Yarbro and others
Defendant:
Adient US LLC, Andre Gist, Manufacturers Industrial Group, L.L.C. and others
Petitioner:
Natasha Renfroe
3Rd Party Defendant:
Hoover Universal, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Circuit Court Clerk Beverly Dunaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Joyner v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02454
Movant:
Donald Joyner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joyner v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02207
Movant:
James Joyner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joyner v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2015cv02588
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Joyner
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joyner v. Phillips et al
as 2:2014cv02670
Plaintiff:
Troy Joyner, Jr.
Defendant:
Fredrick Phillips, M. Keaton, The City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
