Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Pike v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Carol Marie Pike
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McKenzie v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02846
Plaintiff:
Steven McKenzie
Defendant:
John Pike and Discount Home Superstore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02866
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Henderson v. SONIC DRIVE IN, MEMPHIS, POPLAR, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2020cv02604
Defendant:
SONIC DRIVE IN, MEMPHIS, COVINGTON PIKE, LLC, SONIC DRIVE IN, OLIVE BRANCH, MS, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RONALD SOLBERG and others
Plaintiff:
Tyaire Henderson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Brisbon v. Covington Pike Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2014cv02868
Plaintiff:
Jessica Brisbon
Defendant:
Covington Pike Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Newble v. Fisher et al
as 1:2014cv01216
Plaintiff:
Leighton Newble
Defendant:
Tonya Fisher, Melvin Bond, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Lester et al
as 2:2013cv02063
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bernard Robinson
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Wendy Smith, Nancy Pike and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland v. Woolfork et al
as 1:2012cv01281
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric McFarland
Defendant:
David L. Woolfork, Jimmy Harris, Rudder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Jim Keras Buick Co., Inc. dba Keras Car Central et al
as 2:2012cv02972
Plaintiff:
Cesley Brown
Defendant:
Jim Keras Buick Co., Inc. dba Keras Car Central and Covington Pike Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
