Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Graves v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
Carli Graves
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Ralph Holmes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Derrick v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Nakia L Derrick
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Power Secure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ANTWINE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD et al
as 5:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTWINE
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD and GREIS TRUCKING AND EXCAVATION INC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
v. ANTWINE et al
as 5:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W ANTWINE
Defendant:
Union Pacific Rr Co
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Franklin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 9:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Monica Lee Ann Franklin and Antwan Franklin
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Joe v. Railroad Co.
as 5:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Joe
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
COLQUITT V UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
CLINT COLQUITT
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RR and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stewart v. Michael G. Hartline et al
as 2:2020cv00187
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Misty Rene McCathern, Michael G. Hartline and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Stewart
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Barnes v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2019cv00027
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Stephen R Barnes
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Crossley v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Rodney E Crossley
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
