Cases 91 - 100 of 182
Mayfield v. Gregory et al
as 9:2016cv00017
Petitioner:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Garry Gregory, Jennifer Hubbard, Gilbert Rodriguez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 4:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
Eric Lane Tyler and Joann Lucylle Tyler
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter v. 420th District Court et al
as 9:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Carpenter
Defendant:
420th District Court, Christine Lane, Troy Mach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Karriker et al
as 6:2015cv01149
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
Gaye L Karriker, Shauna Vestal, William D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobace LLC v. Lane Bryant, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00943
Plaintiff:
Kobace LLC
Defendant:
Lane Bryant, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Schuff v. Lane et al
as 9:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
Corey Joseph Schuff
Defendant:
Darrell Lane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Frazier et al
as 6:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
William . Rogers
Defendant:
Eileen Frazier , Ron Voda , Donna Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oberalis LLC v. One Kings Lane Inc.
as 2:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Oberalis LLC
Defendant:
One Kings Lane Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rodriguez v. University of Texas Tech Health Science Center et al
as 6:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Erik M Rodriguez
Defendant:
University of Texas Tech Health Science Center, University of Texas Medical Branch, Paul Shrode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Administrative Segregation Security et al
as 6:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Administrative Segregation Security, Philip K Whigham, Erick Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
