Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 91 - 100 of 3,868
Cramer v. USA
as 1:2023cv00355
Petitioner: Christopher Emory Cramer
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Ahmed v. USA
as 1:2023cv00354
Petitioner: Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmed
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Rodonaia v. USA
as 1:2023cv00356
Petitioner: Grigoriy T Rodonaia
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Voisine v. USA
as 4:2023cv00831
Petitioner: Farion Voisine
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
UNM Rainforest Innovations v. Toyota Motor North America Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00424
Plaintiff: UNM Rainforest Innovations
Defendant: Toyota Motor North America Inc, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC. and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
New Amsterdam, LLC v. Medtronic plc et al
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff: New Amsterdam, LLC
Defendant: Medtronic plc, Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Martinez v. USA
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff: Estela Martinez
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Segura-Martinez v. USA
as 4:2023cv00824
Petitioner: Gregorio Segura-Martinez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Rogers v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2023cv00160
Petitioner: Terrell Justin Rogers
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Harrison v. Allergan USA, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00440
Plaintiff: Craig E. Harrison, M.D., P.A. d/b/a Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery Center - Tyler
Defendant: Allergan USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?