Cases 131 - 140 of 69,281
Johnson v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Marvin Johnson
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bush v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Frederick Bush
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Allen v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Sharlotte Allen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Hadnot v. Lufkin ISD et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Mickey Hadnot
Defendant:
Lufkin ISD, Lynn Torres, Jay Jost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Advanced Coding Technologies LLC v. Google LLC
as 2:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Advanced Coding Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Terry et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Terry and Tryla Terry
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Coe v. Coe et al
as 6:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brenton L Coe
Defendant:
Eve Coe, Julia Martinez-New, Warden FNU Cozbi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulbelli's Restaurant L.P. v. AmTrust Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
FULBELLIS RESTAURANT L.P.
Defendant:
AMTRUST INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phillips et al v. County Of Smith et al
as 6:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Derek-Lee Phillips and Cody-Storm Voss
Respondent:
County of Smith, Johnathan Peters, Riley Rugg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
