Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Solis v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2018cv00528
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions/Medical League Concepts, Donald Trump, Dept of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Solis v. Warden FCC Beaumont Complex
as 1:2018cv00106
Petitioner:
Rueben Solis
Respondent:
Warden FCC Beaumont Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fortuna Solis v. Sadriev et al
as 9:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jose Hilario Fortuna Solis
Defendant:
Farmon S Sadriev and Bekzod Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solis v. Walker et al
as 6:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Juan Solis
Defendant:
Robert A Walker, Vernon B. Mitchell, Jr., Delious I. Furr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amrhein v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendiola v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Raul Mendiola
Defendant:
Unknown Party, J Solis, T Hausle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Verrilli, Jr. et al
as 4:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Balistreri-Amrhein and Anthony J Balistreri
Defendant:
Donald Verrilli, Jr., Loretta Lynch, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Solis et al
as 4:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Enrique Solis and Davis Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Solis v. Mallet et al
as 1:2015cv00061
Plaintiff:
Sergio Solis
Defendant:
FNU Mallet, S Polavarapu, Brandi Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Walter et al
as 5:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Walter, G.I. Department, FNU Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
