Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Glenn v. Warden, FPC Bryan
as 1:2022cv00319
Petitioner:
Debra Wallace Glenn
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Daily v. Lemas et al
as 4:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Royce Glenn Daily
Defendant:
Estela Gomez Lemas and Elbert Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Gregg County Jail et al
as 6:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Glenn Alan Chavez
Defendant:
Gregg County Jail, Gregg County Medical Unit and Dr White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roland v. Nacogdoches County et al
as 9:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
Cory Glenn Roland
Defendant:
Nacogdoches County, Salomon Landeros, Justin Cody Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olvera v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2021cv00145
Petitioner:
Glenn Yanez Olvera
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Glenn v. USA
as 1:2021cv00057
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Ray Glenn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hardin v. LeBlanc Unit et al
as 6:2020cv00627
Defendant:
LeBlanc Unit Medical Department and LeBlanc Unit
Plaintiff:
Jessie Glenn Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. LeBlanc Unit et al
as 1:2020cv00519
Defendant:
LeBlanc Unit Medical Department and LeBlanc Unit
Plaintiff:
Jessie Glenn Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis et al v. Southwestern Correctional, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Southwestern Correctional, LLC d/b/a LASALLE CORRECTIONS, LLC and LASALLE SOUTHWEST CORRECTIONS, Steven Foltz, A Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glenn Austin and Mary Margaret Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv00184
Plaintiff:
Daisy Williams, Clifford Bell, Kiesha Johnson and others
Defendant:
Jason Orsak, Maria Cruz, Erica Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
