Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Mayfield v. Medical Department et al
as 6:2015cv00513
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Medical Department, Administrative Segregation Security, Kent Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Medical Department et al
as 9:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
Larry M Mayfield
Defendant:
Medical Department, Administrative Segregation Security, Kent Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haley v. Entire Oilfield Services & Supply LLC
as 1:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
Robert Haley
Defendant:
Entire Oilfield Services & Supply LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Helms et al
as 4:2014mc00015
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert A Helms, Janniece S Kaelin, Deven Sellers and others
Receiver:
Thomas L Taylor, III
Haley v. Sleep Xperts, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00716
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Haley
Defendant:
Sleep Xperts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Haley v. Williams
as 9:2013cv00262
Petitioner:
Acie Frederick Haley
Respondent:
Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haley, III v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv00595
Petitioner:
William Dudley Haley, III
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fields et al v. King et al
as 9:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Fields and Stephen Fields
Defendant:
Ricky King, Stephen Stroud, John Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Capitol County Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
as 1:2007cv00975
Plaintiff:
Randy Williams, Randy Williams, Samuel Haley and others
Defendant:
Capitol County Mutual Fire Insurance Company and The Reliable Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Haley v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 9:2007cv00073
Petitioner:
Fred Anthony Haley
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
