Cases 31 - 40 of 2,058
Gayton v. State
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Gayton
Defendant:
State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linh N. Bass and Monglinh Ngo Bass
Defendant:
Joshua Jackson, Jason Schmoker, Kenneth Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kohute v. US Secret Service Office
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Kohute
Defendant:
US Secret Service Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Spencer v. Collin County, Texas
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
James Stephen Spencer
Defendant:
Collin County, Texas
Other:
James J Juneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BIELSTEIN, ET AL. v. SIGNATURE SOLAR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
MARK A. BIELSTEIN and RACHELLE R. BIELSTEIN
Defendant:
SIGNATURE SOLAR LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, JAMES SHOWALTER and JOHN SHOWALTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Taylor v. Davis et al
as 9:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Quendell Taylor
Defendant:
James Davis, Christopher Farrell, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
James Antwone Acy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valentinis-Dee v. Real Estate Value
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Defendant:
Real Estate Value
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rice v. Marbar Logistics Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
James Rice
Defendant:
Marbar Logistics Inc., Super Ego Holdings, LLC, Luis Alberto Gonzale Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
