Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Ray v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
Robert Ray
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Lane Blasingame , Mario Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2014cv00477
Plaintiff:
Phalisa Smith
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Rail Service and Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2014cv00012
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landmark Technology, LLC v. Union Pacific Corp.
as 6:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Union Pacific Corp.
Counter_claimant:
Union Pacific Corp.
Counter_defendant:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Frederick v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2013cv00971
Plaintiff:
David B Frederick
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Lindsay v. Trans-Canada et al
as 6:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Courtland Dewayne Lindsay
Defendant:
Trans-Canada, LaGloria Inc, Union Pacific and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Pro Sands Processing, LLC
as 4:2013mc00020
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Pro Sands Processing, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Buckley et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Henry J Buckley , Gilbert A Curtis , Ronald Morale and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Alloy Polymers, Inc.
as 9:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Alloy Polymers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
