Cases 41 - 50 of 1,232
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Freddie Monroe Pickett
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Securus Technologies
Petitioner:
John W. Banos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU LNU, FNU Rodwag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Sheriff Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, FNU Arrant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. John Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
John Francis
Defendant:
John Doe and Table Company in TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linh N. Bass and Monglinh Ngo Bass
Defendant:
Joshua Jackson, Jason Schmoker, Kenneth Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Madden Home Design, LLC et al v. Countryside Developments, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Madden Home Design, LLC and House Plan Zone, LLC
Defendant:
Countryside Developments, LLC, Countryside Home Building, LLC, Zeb Pardue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Garrett v. Kroger Texas L.P. et al
as 6:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Nakisha Garrett
Defendant:
Kroger Texas L.P. and John Doe Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
