Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Watson v. Habitat For Humanity of Smith County
as 6:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Carl Watson
Defendant:
Habitat For Humanity of Smith County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 601 Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Barnett v. Travis County, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00249
Defendant:
Mayor of San Antonio Ron Nirenburg, District Attorney Susan Deski, Cameron County Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Caroline Sue Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Dr. Julye et al
as 9:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
M.C. Metcalf
Defendant:
Dr. Julye, Dr. Montgomery, Unknown Female Officer Rover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Arbesfeld et al
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Mark A Arbesfeld, Timothy L Watson and Raymond M Hankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Watson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00941
Petitioner:
Tyler Gage Watson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Lamar County
as 4:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Tyler Gage Watson
Respondent:
Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minix v. Morrell et al
as 6:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Paul Minix
Defendant:
Nicholas Morrell, Tom Watson, Trey Hattaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00321
Petitioner:
Christopher M. Watson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
