Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Morgan v. Davis et al
as 6:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
David Allen Morgan
Defendant:
Davis, Officer Alsobrooke, Officer Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00496
Petitioner:
Steven Louis Massey, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monk v. Massey et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, FNU Vonn, FNU Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Podeschi v. First United Bank et al
as 4:2022cv00658
Not Classified By Court:
US Magistrate Judge Kimberly C Priest Johnson and John W Hughes
Plaintiff:
Darrin Podeschi
Defendant:
First United Bank, Greg Massey and Mark Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Massey v. Townsend
as 6:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Steven Louis Massey, Jr.
Respondent:
Elliot Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Locke v. Rivera Jr. et al
as 4:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Nelson A. Locke
Defendant:
Augustin Rivera Jr., Teresa Ereon Giltner, Harold Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Madron v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael Don Madron
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, UTMB Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Massey
as 6:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Smith
Defendant:
Victoria D Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEO LUNA v. MASSEY SERVICES, INC.
as 4:2021cv00014
Defendant:
MASSEY SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
LEO LUNA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
