Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sterns v. Child Protective Services et al
as 9:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Katasha Sterns
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Emalee Trawoski and Jim Lostracco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v Upshur Co. District Attorney Office et al
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
Upshur Co. District Attorney Office, Upshur Co. Sheriff Department, Brownsboro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Batz v. Child Protective Services et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Child Protective Services, Jefferson County Sheriff Dept and Jefferson County Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Edgar Batz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Rojas et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff Department, Charles F Rojas, Jefferson Child Protective Service and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richey v. Fontana et al
as 4:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Collin County Child Protective Services, Chris Fontana and Chelsea Pensata
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Richey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Retz et al v. State of Texas et al
as 6:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thomas Retz, Tammy Sue Retz and N.A.R.
Defendant:
State of Texas and DFPS Child Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Tonya M Hall, John A Hall, Sr. and T L
Defendant:
Euphemia T Davis and Texas Child Protection Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hodge v. Anderson et al
as 1:2012cv00400
Petitioner:
Laurel A Hodge
Respondent:
Ann Anderson and Texas Department of Child Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dingler et al v. Cooke County Child Protective Services et al
as 4:2012cv00471
Plaintiff:
Barbara Joan Dingler, A. L. R. and K. J. B.
Defendant:
Cooke County Child Protective Services, Lisa Christianson, Mary Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
