Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Bounds v. Rock Haulers, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00560
Defendant:
Rock Haulers, LLC and Ryan Hodges Battiest
Plaintiff:
Kharissa Bounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bacot v. Crawford et al
as 6:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robert Bacot
Defendant:
Sgt Deborah Crawford, Jessie Dowling, Brent Dickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Grassano Texas Inc
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Hodges
Defendant:
Grassano Texas Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hodge v. Polk County Jail et al
as 9:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michael Bee Hodge
Respondent:
Polk County Jail, Byron Lyons, Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Livingston Police Department et al
as 9:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Michael Bee Hodge
Respondent:
Livingston Police Department, Matt Parrish, Chris Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Hodge Unit Staff and Admin. et al
as 6:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jacob Charles Smith
Defendant:
Hodge Unit Staff and Admin., Hodge Unit Warden, Hodge Unit Laundry Boss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Monk v. Massey et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, FNU Vonn, FNU Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
