Cases 1 - 10 of 31
WAPP TECH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 4:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
WAPP TECH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and WAPP TECH CORP.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00069
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00714
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Ayati-Ghaffari v. Dimon et al
as 4:2019cv00535
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and James Dimon
Plaintiff:
Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Ayati-Ghaffari v. Dimon et al
as 4:2019cv00533
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and James Dimon
Plaintiff:
Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krishnan et al v. Zaidi et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Defendant:
Alley Hussain Zaidi, PeirsonPatterson LLC, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Muralidharan Krishnan and Indiragandhi Kenthapadi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayati-Ghaffari v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2018cv00617
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Home Finance, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ayati-Ghaffari v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2018cv00602
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayati-Ghaffari v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2018cv00483
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Home Finance, LLC
Plaintiff:
Feysal Ayati-Ghaffari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garnishee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
