Cases 1 - 10 of 288
Sheridan v. USA
as 6:2024cv00335
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Clay Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Singleton v. Schiroh et al
as 9:2024cv00176
Respondent:
Bennie Schiroh, Jeremy Alexander and Jeffrey Dean
Plaintiff:
Brent Wade Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanton, Sr. v. Vinson et al
as 1:2024cv00312
Defendant:
Pedro M Boykin, Kaylin R Vinson, Jeffrey R Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, et al., v. USA, et al.
as 4:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Smooth Multi-Services Platform, Others Unknown and Ajide Technology Corporation
Defendant:
USA, Sean Jeffrey Taylor, Jason Rennie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fulton v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Turn Key Medical
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fulton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Bin Burgess
Defendant:
Turnkey Medical Annex Staff, FNU Marshall and Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leger v. Safeport Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00195
Defendant:
Safeport Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
jeffrey leger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Demunbrun v. Estep et al
as 4:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Demunbrun
Defendant:
Detective Mitchell Estep and Detective Paul Keith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harp v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Levi Harp
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
