Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Lane et al v. City of Jasper, Texas
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Lane, Jr and Jacqueline Cooper
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Mortgage Contracting Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Lane Gay
Defendant:
Mortgage Contracting Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Foster v. Lane et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Darron Lane, Donald Muniz, Dwight L. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Push Data LLC v. Lane Bryant Inc.
as 4:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Push Data LLC
Defendant:
Lane Bryant Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Butler v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Trustee Jack Butler
Defendant:
Attorney Patrick K. Woods, Attorney Brandon Lane, Judge Andrew Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 6:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Respondent:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 9:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Defendant:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patent Armory Inc. v. Artec Europe, S.a.r.l.
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. and Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Artec Europe, S.a.r.l.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Albright v. Lane et al
as 1:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Albright
Defendant:
Kevin Lane, Kathrine Branch and Buddy Hahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzales et al v. Hile et al
as 1:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gonzales and Michele Renee Gonzales
Defendant:
Larissa M. Hile, Jenna Seeney, William Longlois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
