Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Moore v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Lane Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00790
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Olageshin v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00360
Defendant:
Miracle McMillian and Tonia Lane
Plaintiff:
Temitope Olageshin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem, Jr. v. Muniz et al
as 9:2024cv00167
Defendant:
Jarry D. Adams, Troy W. Driskell, State Classification Subsequent Hearing Committee Member #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane et al v. City of Jasper, Texas
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Lane, Jr and Jacqueline Cooper
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gay v. Mortgage Contracting Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Lane Gay
Defendant:
Mortgage Contracting Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Foster v. Lane et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Darron Lane, Donald Muniz, Dwight L. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Push Data LLC v. Lane Bryant Inc.
as 4:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Push Data LLC
Defendant:
Lane Bryant Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Butler v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
Trustee Jack Butler
Defendant:
Attorney Patrick K. Woods, Attorney Brandon Lane, Judge Andrew Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 6:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Respondent:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
