Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stovall v. Raytheon Company
as 4:2023cv00629
Defendant:
Raytheon Company a/k/a Raytheon Technologies, Raytheon Company and Raytheon Technologies
Claimant:
William Kibbey Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stovall v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00793
Petitioner:
Victor Stovall
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Culpepper v. McCandless et al
as 6:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
William D Culpepper
Defendant:
Allan D McCandless, Charles C. Bailey, Jimmy L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culpepper v. McCandless et al
as 2:2014cv00736
Plaintiff:
William D Culpepper
Defendant:
Allan D McCandless, Charles C. Bailey, Jimmy L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swanzy v. Stovall et al
as 2:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
Pat Lane Swanzy, Jr
Defendant:
G. F. (Corky) Stovall, Courtney Holland and Don Dowd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanzy v. Stovall et al
as 6:2013cv00123
Plaintiff:
Pat Lane Swanzy, Jr
Defendant:
G. F. (Corky) Stovall, Courtney Holland and Don Dowd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPOTTS et al v. USA et al
as 1:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Andre Spotts, BILLY AGUERO, MARCUS T. ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stobaugh v. Rosiek et al
as 5:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
John F Stobaugh
Defendant:
FNU Rosiek, Kathy Stockwell, W Stovall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Brinker International, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
Amber Stovall
Defendant:
Brinker International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. Stovall et al
as 1:2007cv00434
Defendant:
Benson Williams Stovall, Bureau of Prisons, T C Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
