Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Perez v. Cactus Feeders, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Cactus Feeders, Inc, Lubbock National Bank, Paul Engler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Duru v. Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Bearkowitz PC et al
as 3:2015cv00435
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant:
Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Bearkowitz PC, Jeffrey W Hastings and Kali M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duru v. Hastings et al
as 3:2014cv04481
Plaintiff:
Rose A Duru
Defendant:
Baker, Donelson, Bearman , Kali M Jackson and Jeffrey W Hastings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hastings v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03168
Plaintiff:
Humphrey K Hastings, Jr
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and DOES 1-10 inclusive
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singh Sarabjeet v. Hastings Entertainment, Inc. et al.
as 2:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Singh Sarabjeet
Defendant:
Hastings Entertainment, Inc., John H. Marmaduke, Jeffrey G. Shrader and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Oberegger et al v. Gurr, et al
as 2:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Andreas Oberegger and David A. Capps
Defendant:
National Entertainment Collectibles Association, Inc. , Joel Weinshanker , Ann S. Lieff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nieman v. RLI Corp. et al
as 3:2014mc00038
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Nieman
Defendant:
RLI Corp., Donald J Driscoll, Daniel O Kennedy and others
Mosley v. Hastings et al
as 3:2014cv00206
Defendant:
Margaret E Hastings and Gold Crest Residential Care, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sharun Mosley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hastings v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv05015
Petitioner:
William Elmer Hastings
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright v. E-Systems LLC et al
as 3:2012cv04715
Plaintiff:
Micheal Wright
Defendant:
E-Systems LLC and Bob Hastings
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
