Cases 41 - 50 of 164
Blake v. Carr
as 4:2020cv00807
Plaintiff:
Genesis Gonzalez, Tanya Torrence, Tiffany Snodgrass and others
Defendant:
Warden Carr, Mrs. Cole-Rowls, Lt. Anothny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alred v. Carr et al
as 4:2020cv00896
Defendant:
Warden Carr, Mrs. Cole-Rowls, Dr. Jowdi and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Alred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Synodis v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
as 3:2020cv01956
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Plaintiff:
Sarah A Synodis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Summers v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
as 3:2020cv01947
Plaintiff:
Sarah Summers
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Derek M. Albus DDS PA et al v. Paychex Inc
as 3:2020cv01796
Plaintiff:
Derek M Albus, Sarah Albus and Derek Albus
Defendant:
Paychex Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shaw et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv01574
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathy Shaw, Stanley Keim, Hazel Wehrle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Vujasinovic et al
as 3:2020cv01199
Defendant:
Randall O Sorrels, David C Kent, Texas Bar Association and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Grisham et al v. Smith
as 3:2020xc00526
Defendant:
Sarah R. Smith
Plaintiff:
Robert N Grisham and William A Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Willis v. Neiman Marcus Group LLC et al
as 4:2019cv01061
Defendant:
Jim Ritter, Sarah Tieh, Holly Turpin and others
Plaintiff:
Shayla Deniece Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Barefoot v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00197
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Sarah Barefoot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
