Cases 41 - 50 of 734
Smith v. Adams et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Franklin Smith
Defendant:
FNU Adams, Vincent Romero and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-134-C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. The City of Irving et al
as 3:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Deronnius R. Young
Defendant:
The City of Irving, Adam Landry, Andrew Hammett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hurdsman v. Cozby et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Jennifer Cozby and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Roderick Delaine Brown and Roderick D Brown
Defendant:
Adam R Gonzales, Nebiyu A Tesfaw, Lori R Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clarence v. Villalobos
as 3:2023cv00766
Petitioner:
Adams Edward Clarence
Respondent:
Moises Villalobos and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunley v. Arlington Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Tamario Hunley
Defendant:
Arlington Police Department, Detective James Jackson, Officer Clint Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
